Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 15196 invoked by uid 6000); 11 Jul 1998 16:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15186 invoked from network); 11 Jul 1998 16:36:48 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 1998 16:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 8376 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 1998 16:36:29 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 09:36:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/modules/standard mod_rewrite.c mod_rewrite.h In-Reply-To: <19980711105609.29419.qmail@hyperreal.org> Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On 11 Jul 1998 rse@hyperreal.org wrote: > mod_rewrite created RewriteLock files under the uid of the parent process, > thus the child processes had no write access to the files. Now a chown() is > done to the uid of the childs if applicable. Isn't this only required for flock()-style locking? fcntl()-style locking can use the same fd for the parent and children... Dean