Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 26549 invoked by uid 6000); 6 Jul 1998 20:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 26537 invoked from network); 6 Jul 1998 20:25:22 -0000 Received: from heinlein.wisewire.com (206.181.238.130) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 1998 20:25:22 -0000 Received: from ex-pgh-1.wisewire.com (ex-pgh-1 [172.30.1.3]) by heinlein.wisewire.com (8.8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id QAA02681 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 16:25:07 -0400 Received: by exchange.wisewire.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 16:32:28 -0400 Message-ID: <01077E3A413FD1118E3200A0C90A40283C27DA@exchange.wisewire.com> From: Sam Robb To: "'new-httpd@apache.org'" Subject: RE: W32 - leading periods? Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 16:32:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Huh. I think it's just a typo - the link text in the article isn't the same as the HREF; there should be an extra '\' between the final period and "productinfo": http://website.oreilly.com/wspro2/../wspro2/.productinfo - Samrobb - srobb@wisewire.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Hyde [SMTP:bhyde@pobox.com] > Sent: Monday, July 06, 1998 3:33 PM > To: new-httpd@apache.org > Subject: W32 - leading periods? > > > In another forum [1] the "lead develper of O'Reilly's WebSite" gives > this example > > http://website.oreilly.com/wspro2/../wspro2/.productinfo > > which WebSite revises into: > > http://website.oreilly.com/wspro2/productinfo/ > > My question? Why does it strip the leading period > off ".productinfo" Is there some reason to be > afraid of files without names, but only extensions? > > - ben hyde > > [1] > http://betty.userland.com/stories/daveWiner/98/07/bobDennyChecksIn.htm > l