Return-Path: <new-httpd-owner-new-httpd-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 25279 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Jun 1998 06:27:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 25272 invoked from network); 9 Jun 1998 06:27:30 -0000
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91)
  by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 1998 06:27:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 18967 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 1998 06:33:03 -0000
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 23:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.3.1
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980609002126.29515K-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96dg4.980608233157.24261W-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information
 regarding copyright and disclaimer.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Sure.  We can just say "this is a release to fix portability problems,
folks who had no trouble compiling don't really need to consider it".

Dean

On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

> Or less time.
> 
> Remember, 1.3.0 doesn't even compile under win32.
> 
> On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> 
> > I know 1.3.0 is just out the door... but we're already getting duplicate
> > reports of various errors such as AIX and SCO compilation troubles (er, I
> > had a few to me directly in private mail).  How about starting the 1.3.1
> > clock, with release during the weekend of the 20th?  (just under two weeks
> > away)
> > 
> > Dean
> > 
> > 
> 
>