httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ralf S. Engelschall" <...@engelschall.com>
Subject Re: 1.3.1-dev and next feature cycle?
Date Thu, 04 Jun 1998 17:12:30 GMT

In article <3576CE29.DBD3848A@ibm.net> you wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:

>> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> >
>> > When we expect 1.3.1 in one or two weeks we should keep the features under the
>> > box and keep the feature freeze state and start with them in 1.3.2-dev. If we
>> > think 1.3.0 is really great and 1.3.1 needs at least four or more weeks I vote
>> > for accepting little feature additions now.
>> >
>> > Actually I vote for the following: Push out 1.3.0 now and 1.3.1 one or two
>> > weeks after it with just bugfixes. Then concentrate on making the 1.3.x branch
>> > not unstable again while pushing in useful new features and enhancements.
>> >
>>
>> I would expect that a good compromise would be a feature freeze
>> but with some lattitude that if there is a VERY VERY nice feature
>> that someone would like added, that it's presented and voted
>> upon. This would prevent a "free-for-all" yet still allow worthwhile
>> additions to the code (in addition to bugfixes of course)

> Good compromise. Leave the door open just a crack!

> I have a Win NT patch to ap_call_exec that will query the NT registry to find CGI
> script interpreter paths based on the script's file extension. This would allow
> Unix scripts to be run on NT without changing the #! line and would save us from
> doing the 'peek-in-the-script' trick to find the interpreter path. I can have it
> ready and tested by next week. Interested or should I save it for 1.3.2?

No, make it available immediately if possible. Then people can vote on it and
perhaps it falls in the cathegory Jim described then it is comitted for 1.3.1.

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com

Mime
View raw message