Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 4718 invoked by uid 6000); 20 May 1998 03:28:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 4709 invoked from network); 20 May 1998 03:28:37 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 20 May 1998 03:28:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 14671 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 1998 04:04:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 21:04:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NT CGI fix In-Reply-To: <355DBC9E.1B0E9696@algroup.co.uk> Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Sat, 16 May 1998, Ben Laurie wrote: > 6. With all that out of the way, I decided to disable the other methods > of spawning children (since they are unsafe, after all). This leads to > other interesting problems, like piped logs and mod_rewrite no longer > working, so I've enabled them again for now. However, they will need to > be eliminated. Gee, have you looked at apache-nspr? I've already dealt with all of this. i.e. you're doing 2.0 things in 1.3. > 7. Now the good news: it seems to work. I'll be committing what I've > done shortly (I hope). I hope not. If you've broken all that stuff then I certainly hope you didn't committ it. > Did I ever mention this would all be much neater in C++? :-) And gee, it would be so much neater if we got to redesign the C interface as well? If you're going to compare apples to apples you can't compare an unchanged, legacy, crappy C interface to a newly designed C++ interface. Dean