Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 28586 invoked by uid 6000); 5 May 1998 21:12:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 28293 invoked from network); 5 May 1998 21:12:32 -0000 Received: from mrelay.jrc.it (139.191.1.65) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 5 May 1998 21:12:32 -0000 Received: from mda00.jrc.it (mda00.jrc.it [139.191.7.10]) by mrelay.jrc.it (LMC5688) with ESMTP id XAA06752; Tue, 5 May 1998 23:12:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from dirkx@localhost) by mda00.jrc.it (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA06794; Tue, 5 May 1998 23:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 23:13:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik X-Sender: dirkx@mda00.jrc.it To: Brian Behlendorf cc: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [STATUS] (apache-1.3) Fri May 1 23:45:24 EDT 1998 In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980505121843.0090f240@hyperreal.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Tue, 5 May 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > At 03:33 PM 5/5/98 +0200, you wrote: > >On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 03:34:02PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > >> What architecture is this on? > > i386-sni-sysv4 > > > >> How much traffic are you seeing? > > +/- 500 ... 1500 reqs/day > > +/- 1 ... 20 MB/day > > Do you think you could try replaying the requests which led to the core > dump? Ideally there'd only be a couple hundred between the time you > restarted and when you got a core dump. Of course this discounts the > possibility of some other request headers causing the stack corruption; if > you don't get a core dump when you replay the requests then maybe capture > the IP traffic is necessary... eek. This is bugly. We have some code to replay 'logfiles' including even some limited IP source spoofing; i.e. mimic a handfull of clients from a single box with some limited reverse dns support. Would that help in any way to recontruct ? Dw