Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 22470 invoked by uid 6000); 19 May 1998 23:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 22461 invoked by uid 24); 19 May 1998 23:10:19 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980519160017.009cf9e0@hyperreal.org> X-Sender: brian@hyperreal.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 16:00:17 -0700 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Brian Behlendorf Subject: Re: mod_include broken? In-Reply-To: <3561ED9E.8C70C913@algroup.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org At 09:37 PM 5/19/98 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >Seems about right to me. Obviously testing is required, though! Though I >think the choice of names is a bit weird (like, I'd've called what you >called in, out and vice versa. If you see what I mean). In this case I kept the semantics used in both mod_cgi and the buff.h definition. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- pure chewing satisfaction brian@apache.org brian@hyperreal.org