Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 24089 invoked by uid 6000); 6 May 1998 15:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 24077 invoked from network); 6 May 1998 15:37:40 -0000 Received: from thoth.mch.sni.de (192.35.17.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 6 May 1998 15:37:40 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de (at relayer thoth.mch.sni.de) Received: from deejai.mch.sni.de (deejai.mch.sni.de [139.25.105.242]) by thoth.mch.sni.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA23139 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 17:37:38 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from martin@localhost) by deejai.mch.sni.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA15177; Wed, 6 May 1998 17:37:37 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980506173735.26204@deejai.mch.sni.de> Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 17:37:35 +0200 From: Martin Kraemer To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: union semun needs to be fixed (for 64-bit) References: <19980506171312.49329@deejai.mch.sni.de> <199805061525.LAA25588@devsys.jaguNET.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: <199805061525.LAA25588@devsys.jaguNET.com>; from Jim Jagielski on Wed, May 06, 1998 at 12:25:35PM -0400 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Wed, May 06, 1998 at 12:25:35PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > But this is only used by Solaris2... No other OS in > conf.h defines NEED_UNION_SEMUN :/ > > And on Solaris2, it's an 'int' Is there already a '64-bit Solaris'? ReliantUNIX requires NEED_UNION_SEMUN as well... And, as I said, it doesn't break any unix where sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) Martin -- | S I E M E N S | | Siemens Nixdorf | ------------- | Voice: +49-89-636-46021 | Informationssysteme AG | N I X D O R F | FAX: +49-89-636-44994 | 81730 Munich, Germany ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request