Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 24709 invoked by uid 6000); 2 May 1998 16:08:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 24701 invoked from network); 2 May 1998 16:08:40 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 2 May 1998 16:08:40 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.8/jag-2.4) id MAA29993 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sat, 2 May 1998 12:08:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199805021608.MAA29993@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Fatal child errors To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 12:08:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Looking over the code, it appears that most of the mutex errors that the cild processes worry about should be fatal. In fact, most places where clean_child_exit(1) is called, it should be a totally fatal error... Comments? -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"