httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: bug database: difference between "analyzed" and "feedback"
Date Sun, 24 May 1998 22:53:36 GMT
+1

On Thu, 21 May 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote:

> 
> OK, so it sounds like the critical difference (in people's opinions) is
> that reports which are valid complaints against our current code should
> remain in "analyzed" until a fix is developed, whereas a new feature
> request should be put in "suspended".  Which means those who have a
> hunkering to fix real, identified, vetted problems should only have to open
> the bug database and look at all the "analyzed" problems and start fixing
> from there.  It also seems like bugs should go from open to feedback if
> more info is needed before going into "analyzed".
> 
> 	Brian
> 
> 
> --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> pure chewing satisfaction                                  brian@apache.org
>                                                         brian@hyperreal.org
> 


Mime
View raw message