httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS
Date Wed, 06 May 1998 04:49:42 GMT
Um, but Roy is the person who added the comment:

    Apache should be sending 200 *and* Accept-Ranges.

Dean

On 6 May 1998 brian@hyperreal.org wrote:

> brian       98/05/05 21:46:28
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   I have examined the mail archives extensively on this issue.  It's apparent
>   that apache'c current behavior regarding range-requests for ranges that go
>   beyond the length of the current object is correct.  See
>   
>   <9711141658.aa15032@paris.ics.uci.edu>
>   
>   where Roy says:
>   
>     The current behavior is correct.  A range which extends beyond the actual
>     length of the entity is possible in cases where a device is attempting
>     to limit the response size (think PDA) even when it doesn't yet know
>     the actual length.  At least, that was the goal.
>   
>   So, you all can now sleep at night.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.377     +0 -10     apache-1.3/STATUS
>   
>   Index: STATUS
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
>   retrieving revision 1.376
>   retrieving revision 1.377
>   diff -u -r1.376 -r1.377
>   --- STATUS	1998/05/06 00:23:56	1.376
>   +++ STATUS	1998/05/06 04:46:27	1.377
>   @@ -167,16 +167,6 @@
>          appropriate environment. Marc and Alexei don't see any
>          big deal. Martin says that not every "env" has a -u flag.
>    
>   -    * 206 vs. 200 issue on Content-Length
>   -	See <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971102000930.5555B-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
>   -	Roy says sending 200 is correct, but Alexei disagrees.
>   -	Marc sides with Alexei.  We were talking about two different PRs.
>   -        Apache should be sending 200 *and* Accept-Ranges.
>   -
>   -	Dean says: I'm still really confused as to what the problem is or
>   -	isn't.  If one of you three could work up a patch that would be
>   -	most excellent.
>   -
>        * Marc's socket options like source routing (kill them?)
>    	Marc, Martin say Yes
>    
>   
>   
>   
> 


Mime
View raw message