httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Child processes signalling server abort
Date Sat, 02 May 1998 20:48:03 GMT
On Sat, 2 May 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, 2 May 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> > Would it be a good thing to wait until we have a few child processes
> > exiting with childfatal over a certain period before the parent exits?
> > It may be possible that some freak error could cause one normally
> > fatal error.  We don't want the whole thing to exit too quickly.
> 
> I'm not sure it's worth it.  I'd rather see the patch go into use, and if
> we find that it can exit too easily then we can fix that... the reason I'm
> concerned is because we'd have to define what a good rate of fatals is,
> and we'd have to get that code correct.  What Jim has now is simple, and
> we can be certain that it'll stop things when they should be stopped.

But the problem is that it can also bring the entire server to a crashing
halt if there is some situation we aren't aware of.  I don't know if that
is acceptable.

That is bad.  Having the server keep running and not work is better in my
books than exiting when it shouldn't.  This assumes, of course, a
dedicated machine for the server.


Mime
View raw message