httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
Subject other/2206: no extension on log files (fwd)
Date Fri, 08 May 1998 16:45:27 GMT
I have never had a problem with windows "*really*" liking to see
extensions on my logfiles.  

Is doing this junk really necessary?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 8 May 1998 16:04:49 -0000
From: "A.Poindexter" <alpo@nettown.com>
To: apbugs@hyperreal.org
Subject: other/2206: no extension on log files


>Number:         2206
>Category:       other
>Synopsis:       no extension on log files
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Fri May  8 09:10:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     alpo@nettown.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        Apache/1.3b6
>Environment:
Windows_NT ESP 4 00 586
>Description:
The log files (access_log and error_log) do not have an extension,
which windows *really* likes to see.  
>How-To-Repeat:
Run the server on an NT box
>Fix:
I suggest appending .txt to these.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]




Mime
View raw message