Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 9701 invoked by uid 6000); 28 Apr 1998 08:31:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 9692 invoked from network); 28 Apr 1998 08:31:18 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 1998 08:31:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29926 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 1998 08:31:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 01:31:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: rewritelog inefficiency Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org There's no pressing need to fd_lock()/fd_unlock() around the rewritelog write() call... unless for some reason the log entries are larger than 4k... typical value for PIPE_MAX -- the guaranteed atomic write size on pipes. Hmm. I don't recall seeing a similar guarantee in NSPR... I'll make a note of that. Dean