Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 22585 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Apr 1998 23:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 22566 invoked from network); 8 Apr 1998 23:11:15 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 1998 23:11:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15986 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 1998 23:12:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 16:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Compromise In-Reply-To: <19980409010722.47678@deejai.mch.sni.de> Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Well whoever. This latest proposal is not in the STATUS. If it is put into the STATUS then we have to wait several more days for folks to vote on it. Why the hell can't we just use what's been voted on already? Why the hell are we continuing this farce? What a waste of time. We could make an April 10 release (that's 2 days from now according to my calendar) if we just implemented what has already been voted on. Dean On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Martin Kraemer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 05:07:05PM -0700, Dean Gaudet wrote: > > i.e. why is jim wasting our time by continuing this discussion when we've > ^^^Not Jim. Blame it on me. I opened the topic again. > > Martin > -- > | S I E M E N S | | Siemens Nixdorf > | ------------- | Voice: +49-89-636-46021 | Informationssysteme AG > | N I X D O R F | FAX: +49-89-636-44994 | 81730 Munich, Germany > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request >