Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 10700 invoked by uid 6000); 13 Apr 1998 17:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10685 invoked from network); 13 Apr 1998 17:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gensym-nt2.gensym.com) (192.156.185.15) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 1998 17:37:46 -0000 Received: by gensym-nt2.gensym.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) id <2WD369YC>; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 13:42:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ben Hyde To: "'new-httpd@apache.org'" Subject: RE: [PATCH] Resolve BUILD warnings under ULTRIX/mips (take 4) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 13:42:00 -0400 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Monday, April 13, 1998 1:05 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall [SMTP:rse@engelschall.com] wrote: > > In article <199804111512.LAA18293@siam.gensym> you wrote: > > > A fourth version of this patch, necessary due to name changes. > > I see the point, Ben. But I think we should do this either via some os.h stuff > (i.e. ap_os_fdopen) or leave ULTRIX as it is (i.e. braindead ;-). Because > bristling the source with #ifdef's just for one braindead platform is a little > bit ugly, isn't it? > Ralf S. Engelschall > rse@engelschall.com > www.engelschall.com I'm kind of excited. I think I'm really really close with this round of patches to NO more warnings in the unix compiles. That makes me so happy. Once there it becomes possible to enforce it as a rule. Maybe somebody who's interested in the style of the patches rather than what they achieve can shake 'em up and take 'em in. Of course if we worry about them for another month it will have taken 9 months and that will add a pretty detail for when I tell the story to my grandchildren. - ben hyde "Process legitimizes outcome."