Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 592 invoked by uid 6000); 21 Apr 1998 03:58:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 579 invoked by uid 24); 21 Apr 1998 03:58:48 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980420210511.00a6ec90@hyperreal.org> X-Sender: brian@hyperreal.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 21:05:11 -0700 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Brian Behlendorf Subject: Re: LGPL code in Apache? In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.3.32.19980420184930.00984ca0@hyperreal.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org The plot thickens. I pulled down libc-4.7.5 from sunsite. No toplevel copyright file. The cvt stuff is in a subdir, "cvt", and there's no copyright in there either. There are copyrights in the des (LGPL and Artistic?), gdbm (GPL), and ufc (LGPL) subdirectories, but not upwards from the cvt directory. What does this mean? There is no copyright? That doesn't make sense. Hmm. Brian At 08:09 PM 4/20/98 -0700, Dean Gaudet wrote: >libc-4 is a linux thing. Look at um... sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/GCC >maybe. It could also be on tsx-11.mit.edu somewhere. > >Dean > >On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > >> I'm having trouble even trying to determine what the precise license on >> "GNU libc-4.6.27" is. I'm presuming "libc-4.6.27" is really old, but just >> how old, and what is its modern-day equivalent? On prep.ai.mit.edu I see >> "glibc-1.x" and "glibc-2.x", I see "libg++-2.7" and "libg++-2.8". > > --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- "Optimism is a strategy for making brian@apache.org a better future." - Noam Chomsky brian@hyperreal.org