Message-ID: <19980426103012.A13665@engelschall.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:30:12 +0200
From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@engelschall.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: New RPM just about ready
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Engelschall, Germany.
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org


In article <19980425163122.D24518@io.com> you wrote:

> I've uploaded (in tar.gz format) the files in an upcoming Red Hat RPM
> I've made for 1.3b6. I've tried to incorporate all suggestions from
> those on the list. So far, only the proxy module is shared. With the
> next release and the fix for module ordering, I'll split out more
> modules, but not all of them, since I imagine its more efficient to
> keep the most commonly used modules in the Apache binary.

> Grab it at:

> ftp://ftp.mindspring.com/users/manojk/apache-1.3b6-4.tar.gz

> Comments?

In the spec you say

# I would use APACI here, since it matches very closely to FHS. But, there
# are differences which I would have to work around. If I have to patch, I
# might as well patch all the way.

I know that package maintainers want to adjust some more paths.  And we should
provide support for this in APACI to make your life easier. So my question is:
WHAT EXACTLY do you need to be customizeable?

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com