Return-Path: <new-httpd-owner-new-httpd-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 22942 invoked by uid 6000); 21 Apr 1998 13:54:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 22921 invoked from network); 21 Apr 1998 13:54:55 -0000
Received: from slarti.muc.de (193.174.4.10)
  by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 1998 13:54:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 9857 invoked by uid 66); 21 Apr 1998 13:51:29 -0000
Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.8.8)
	id PAA27118; Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:38:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <19980421153843.A26980@engelschall.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:38:43 +0200
From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@engelschall.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Making HAVE_XXXX_H automatic (take 2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91i
Organization: Engelschall, Germany.
X-Home: http://www.engelschall.com/
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org


In article <199804211229.IAA20739@devsys.jaguNET.com> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> 
>>  #ifdef HAVE_DL_H
>>  #include <dl.h>

> Certainly we can also test for the above, right?

The patch _already_ tests for it!
Actually it already tests for the following headers:

	<dlfcn.h>
	<dl.h>
	<bstring.h>
	<crypt.h>
	<unistd.h>
	<sys/resource.h>
	<sys/select.h>

And of course we can _AND SHOULD_ use these automatic
when we want or need more HAVE_XXXX_H conditions.

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com