Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 21749 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Apr 1998 16:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 21741 invoked from network); 1 Apr 1998 16:01:41 -0000 Received: from thoth.mch.sni.de (192.35.17.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 1998 16:01:41 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de (at relayer thoth.mch.sni.de) Received: from deejai.mch.sni.de (deejai.mch.sni.de [139.25.105.242]) by thoth.mch.sni.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA05285 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 18:01:38 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from martin@localhost) by deejai.mch.sni.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA04804; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 18:01:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980401180133.05520@deejai.mch.sni.de> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 18:01:33 +0200 From: Martin Kraemer To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: vetoing hide.h References: <199804010236.SAA20775@gabber.c2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: <199804010236.SAA20775@gabber.c2.net>; from sameer on Tue, Mar 31, 1998 at 07:36:22PM -0800 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Tue, Mar 31, 1998 at 07:36:22PM -0800, sameer wrote: > It appears to me that global replace w/o EXPECTED_APACHE_API > may be a reasonable compromise. ...and with (finally?) a proper documentation of the new API interface? Martin -- | S I E M E N S | | Siemens Nixdorf | ------------- | Voice: +49-89-636-46021 | Informationssysteme AG | N I X D O R F | FAX: +49-89-636-44994 | 81730 Munich, Germany ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request