httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/test/rename apapi.h
Date Mon, 06 Apr 1998 17:45:53 GMT

On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> As far as I know, the use of ap_ for API functions was the "alternate"
> method, and I had vetoed that on the grounds that it clashes with
> the use of ap_ for "generic, non-API" functions (like ap_snprintf).
> Unless we say that the present ap_ functions (those in libap.a) are
> now part of the API, I think it's confusing to use the same prefix
> for both "classes" of functions. If so, then I would rescind my
> veto, but not until that's all agreed.

I'm sorry but I don't believe this is an issue you can veto.  You can vote
for an alternative but you can't veto.  I'm certain this is mentioned in
the guidelines. 


View raw message