httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: 1.3b6
Date Fri, 10 Apr 1998 17:25:23 GMT
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>     - Prepare the rename.cf file for APX_=ap_ because as we've seen in the
>       debates the what-is-API-and-what-is-not problematic cannot be and
>       shouldn't be solved _THIS TIME_. Instead we concentrate on just solving
>       the HIDE veto by doing the general ap_-renaming for clean namespaces.
>       The API-decision can be done via API-dict.html for 1.3 and later (1.3.1
>       or 2.0) perhaps with a renaming. But at _THIS TIME_ we now only
>       concentrate on the clean namespace  because this is the only way we have
>       consensus. [Ralf]

I still object to reusing the already assigned ap_ prefix for an
incompatible purpose. Why do it? Just choose something else. At the very
least, rename existing ap_ functions.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|  Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |Apache-SSL author    http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache

Mime
View raw message