httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Behlendorf <br...@hyperreal.org>
Subject Re: OS Name in SERVER_VERSION (fwd)
Date Tue, 14 Apr 1998 02:17:36 GMT
At 09:54 PM 4/13/98 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Alexei Kosut wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah. I think the general consensus is that having the server return
>> "Server: Apache/1.3.1
Linux/0.9.4.to.exploit.follow.these.simple.steps.etc..."
>> is a bad idea. But I can't really see any problems resulting from simply
>> adding a "Unix" or "Win32" onto the end. Except, of course, that they do
>> not fall into the token/token form prescribed by HTTP. (OS/Win32, OS/Unix  
>> maybe, to make it more clear what's going on?)
>> 
>
>Good point...

Win32/Intel, Win32/Alpha, Linux/Sparc, Solaris/Intel, maybe?  

	Brian


--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
"Optimism is a strategy for making                         brian@apache.org
a better future." - Noam Chomsky                        brian@hyperreal.org

Mime
View raw message