httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Behlendorf <>
Subject Re: renaming after-effects
Date Tue, 14 Apr 1998 01:14:10 GMT
At 06:02 PM 4/13/98 -0700, Dean Gaudet wrote:
>Yes, but nobody has even bothered to comment on some of my other comments.

Well some of them were obvious:

>- ap_log_pid used ap_pid_fname as an argument, it was an unfixed shadow,
>  I committed a fix

comment: cool.

>- I've spent 3 hours converting various patches.  This would have been
>avoided with HIDE.  I know this will trip up some other folks as well.  If
>there was a way to avoid this work then it's not clear from the CHANGES
>entry -- i.e. I approached this as if I wasn't on the "inside" of the
>development process.  I suspect I could have run the rename thing again
>for at least some of the changes... if that's the case then someone please
>update the upgrading_to_1_3.html document.

Looks like upgrading_to_1_3.html was indeed updated, the src/CHANGES entry
is OK in my opinion but could be improved, the ./CHANGES file should
probably have an entry about this.  Anyone who wants to weather the debate
can check out the mail logs, at least the logs of the CVS changes,
particularly of 1.3/STATUS.

>- MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER hasn't been incremented yet

Looks like rse did it.


"Optimism is a strategy for making               
a better future." - Noam Chomsky              

View raw message