httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Making HAVE_XXXX_H automatic (take 2)
Date Tue, 21 Apr 1998 19:02:50 GMT
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> 
> In article <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980421102728.2779B-100000@valis.worldgate.com> you wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> >[...]
> > This has possible bad side-effects.  There are systems that _have_ header
> > files but where they should not be included.  You also will likely
> > run into problems with headers that have prereqs and won't compile
> > without them.
> 
> > If people want a 1.3.0 soon, we can't do this now.  I'm really not sure
> > thta this is appropriate at this point.
> 
> Then we should minimalize the patch to just automate the
> dlfcn.h and dl.h headers. How sounds this?
> 

Better. :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message