httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Make HAVE_XXXX_H automatic
Date Tue, 21 Apr 1998 12:00:07 GMT
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> Hmmm... yes, but when I think a little bit more into the future I find that
> conf_auto.h is not as bad as it looks: Why? <grin> I have one additional usage
> in mind. APACI currently has to create the src/apaci script where -DXXXX
> commands stay because it is totally ugly to blow up such massively the CFLAGS
> directly when building. An alternative didn't exist in the past because there
> was no header file the "configure" script could append his defines to. But
> when we use conf_auto.h this could be such a header file. The name implies
> that it contains "auto"-generated "conf"iguration stuff. There then not only
> the src/Configure could append its stuff, configure could, too.
> 

Yeah... but again I think restraint is called for right now...
Just bug fixes until 1.3.0. There's a lot I'd like to do revamping
Configure as well, but I'm being good :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message