httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From (Ralf S. Engelschall)
Subject Re: Compromise
Date Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:49:14 GMT

In article <> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> Ok, there is no loss of functionality when we at least provide the
>> apapi_compat.h header, of course. Ok, I can live with this, too.  Then let us
>> first rename anything to ap_ (to make HIDE obsolete) and remove HIDE as the
>> consequence. Then let us push out 1.3b6 and _THEN_ we can again try to debate
>> about more meaningful prefixes. I think this should be an acceptable way even
>> for Ken and Jim, isn't it? Because the rename-scripts can be used later again
>> to move some ap_xxx to <whatever>...

> If we could, before 1.3b6, do the little renaming and moving required
> for some already hidden functions (the one's already ap_ which ARE API
> compared with the ap_'s that aren't, and the 2 apapi_ ones) then I
> would +1 that in a heartbeat.

I know what point you want to address, Jim, but sorry, my english is a little
bit too bad to understand what exactly should be renamed to what. Do you mean
we should first rename existing ap_xxx functions to xxx or to apapi_xxx? BTW,
independend how you want it, it can be done in, too. Or do you
explicitly want to change them in the source manually before?

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall

View raw message