httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/test/rename apapi.h
Date Mon, 06 Apr 1998 23:30:31 GMT
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> In the first
> variant ap_ is there because apapi_ is really too long and I personally really
> think the libap stuff should be threated as API stuff. So, ap_ for all public
> API stuff is best: It's Apache specific and its short.

That's the debate... should libap stuff be considered API? I can see
reasons why both ways, but it was never really brought up that way
before, AFAIK.

   Jim Jagielski   |||   |||
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

View raw message