httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/test/rename apapi.h apapi.h.mk rename.cf
Date Mon, 06 Apr 1998 21:15:54 GMT
Dean Gaudet wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > As far as I know, the use of ap_ for API functions was the "alternate"
> > method, and I had vetoed that on the grounds that it clashes with
> > the use of ap_ for "generic, non-API" functions (like ap_snprintf).
> > Unless we say that the present ap_ functions (those in libap.a) are
> > now part of the API, I think it's confusing to use the same prefix
> > for both "classes" of functions. If so, then I would rescind my
> > veto, but not until that's all agreed.
> 
> I'm sorry but I don't believe this is an issue you can veto.  You can vote
> for an alternative but you can't veto.  I'm certain this is mentioned in
> the guidelines. 
> 

Sure I can. It's stupid.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message