Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 20867 invoked by uid 6000); 21 Mar 1998 22:36:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20861 invoked from network); 21 Mar 1998 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from ns2.remulak.net (HELO Mail.Golux.Com) (root@198.115.138.27) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 1998 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from Golux.Com (p13.ts4.nashu.NH.tiac.com [198.69.237.206]) by Mail.Golux.Com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA23387; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 17:34:56 -0500 Message-ID: <351441BC.628C35ED@Golux.Com> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 17:39:56 -0500 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Marc Slemko wrote: > > Sheesh. This "defend Configure for being the be all and end all" is > getting tiring. I don't think that's what Jim was doing at all. What he was doing was not defending Configure, but protesting the attack on it. I think he has a very good point: the CVS commit logs have been wandering away from prose descriptions of what was changed and what the change fixed. Nowadays they contain anything from a weather report to a a diatribe about some unrelated (or only tenuously related) aspect of the project. Let's keep the philosophical discussions in email, and not the CVS logs. Someone looking at a change six months from now is likely to have no clew about the discussion environment, and care less. It's going to want to know what the change fixed. #ken P-)} Ken Coar Apache Group member "Apache Server for Dummies"