Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 21561 invoked by uid 6000); 30 Mar 1998 13:46:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21554 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1998 13:46:19 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 1998 13:46:19 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.8/jag-2.4) id IAA12968 for new-httpd@apache.org; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:46:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199803301346.IAA12968@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:46:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <19980330021619.26302.qmail@hyperreal.org> from "randy@hyperreal.org" at Mar 30, 98 02:16:19 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org randy@hyperreal.org wrote: > > + > + I agree with Dean 100%. The work created to keep this straight > + far outweighs any gain this could give. -Randy > + I think the reason why is because we don't _know_ what should be ap_, what should be appri_, appub_ etc... With that in mind, _sure_ it's easier to just call everything ap_ and be done with it. But it doesn't do one thing at all about differentiating what's API, public or private, which is what this whole thing was about, as far as I can recall. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"