Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 9566 invoked by uid 6000); 26 Mar 1998 23:28:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 9559 invoked from network); 26 Mar 1998 23:28:53 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 1998 23:28:53 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.8/jag-2.4) id SAA15082 for new-httpd@apache.org; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:28:49 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199803262328.SAA15082@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:28:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199803261843.TAA04071@en1.engelschall.com> from "Ralf S. Engelschall" at Mar 26, 98 07:43:41 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > But > nevertheless I think the code freeze is not over, or is it? I think we should > not commit new stuff now blindly just because we voted +1 for APACI. That we > make an exception shouldn't mean that we go and no longer are pessimistic > about such stuff. > Unless we decide to allow the Release Manager to have real teeth, and to abide by their decisions, code freezes mean nothing at all. There will _always_ be "something" that "just needs to be added" or "doesn't break anything at all but adds a real cool feature"... And as long as we consider our own wants and needs as > that of the group, then we will keep up this absurd situation of beta releases never being released. Not a comment directed towards APACI, just an observation of the status quo. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"