Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 19509 invoked by uid 6000); 24 Mar 1998 12:46:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 19467 invoked from network); 24 Mar 1998 12:46:47 -0000 Received: from slarti.muc.de (193.174.4.10) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 1998 12:46:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 9397 invoked by uid 66); 24 Mar 1998 12:45:29 -0000 Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.8.8) for new-httpd@apache.org id NAA22627; Tue, 24 Mar 1998 13:31:17 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199803241231.NAA22627@en1.engelschall.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-site/dist README.html To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 13:31:17 +0100 (MET) From: rse@engelschall.com (Ralf S. Engelschall) Organization: Engelschall, Germany. X-Home: http://www.engelschall.com/ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org In article <35179A94.7509462F@Golux.Com> you wrote: > Dean Gaudet wrote: >> >> On 24 Mar 1998 dgaudet@hyperreal.org wrote: >> >> > KEYS file after unpacking the >> > distribution.

>> > 
e.g.
>> >   -% pgp < KEYS
>> >   -% gunzip apache_1.2.5.tar.gz
>> >   -% pgp apache_1.2.5.tar.asc  apache_1.2.5.tar
>> >   +% pgpk -a KEYS
>> >   +% pgpv apache_1.2.6.tar.gz.asc
>> >
>> >> I dunno, I'm blissfully ignorant of pgp, but it seems quite foolish for us >> to suggest that the KEYS file in the distribution is to be trusted. This >> should really be pointing folks at some key server I'd think. > Or at least from the Web site. I don't know what these "pgpk" and "pgpv" > commands are; they're certainly not standard. They are, but only in PGP 5.0. I really would like to see this changed back to PGP 2.6.3 commands. Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com