From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199803011804.NAA29067@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: [CONTRIB] Autoconf Interface Emulation
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:04:14 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199803011641.RAA23032@en1.engelschall.com> from "Ralf S.
 Engelschall" at Mar 1, 98 05:41:35 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> 
> In article <199803011623.LAA28718@devsys.jaguNET.com> you wrote:
> 
> > Nope. Not for 1.3. We all agreed about that.
> > -1
> 
> Have you really looked into the code, Jim?
> 

Nope... I vetoed it for concept. If it was earlier in the 1.3 cycle
and there wasn't such a debate on the whole [cC]onfigure stuff,
then I would be much more open. I'll be honest: I think it's
a neat concept. In fact, I'd _like_ to +1 it. But I can't.
It's a new concept, and a new feature and just doesn't belong
this late in the game for a 1.3.0 release. Since the odds are
good that a 1.3.1 will be in the future, I think this would be
a neat addition for that (since a 1.3.1 will be much more than
the simple 1.3.0->1.3.1 would make you believe).

So let me clarify: -1 for 1.3.0, +1 (concept) for 1.3.x/2.x

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"