httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: non-buffered CGIs suck
Date Fri, 06 Mar 1998 21:58:27 GMT


On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

> I don't care about the performace of their system.  For all I care they
> could go shove it off a cliff.  I do care about my network falling over
> from that sort of crap.  This does not just impact the server and the
> client accessing it, and that is the whole point.  The code, as written,
> can perform fine for many people and can do everything they need, so why
> change it?  

I'll repeat an earlier question... show me that your CGI examples aren't
degenerate.

How about one of the Stronghold folks tell us if they've experienced any
troubles with this CGI buffering change... which has been in stronghold
for over a year now I believe.

Dean



Mime
View raw message