httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject Re: vetoing hide.h
Date Wed, 01 Apr 1998 02:37:32 GMT
On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 31 Mar 1998 rasmus@bellglobal.com wrote:
> 
> > My main motivation is to have things like RedHat Linux, for example, ship
> > with a mod_so enabled httpd that I can then feed modules to and add them 
> > on the fly without the user ever having to recompile his httpd.
> 
> I too find this to be a huge advantange to not having any option w.r.t.
> HIDE.  It should always be on, or we should implement another equivalent
> solution using global replace.  There should be no option.

Perhaps you want to make it an undocumented (or less documented) option,
but don't remove it completely.  At the very least add a "don't turn this
off!  don't!  really!"


Mime
View raw message