httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>
Subject Re: paper on "Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control" (fwd)
Date Wed, 04 Mar 1998 19:15:08 GMT
The only way around this is to not disable Nagle.  It may now be possible
to do this without negative impact if we do things right.  I will be
looking into it further.

On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

> Dean, that explains it. Sigh.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:25:00 -0600 (CST)
> From: David Borman <dab@BSDI.COM>
> To: end2end-interest@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: paper on "Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion  Control"
> 
> 
> All this discussion about the Nagle algorithm, buffer sizes
> read/write sizes, etc. has been interesting.  I'm not responding
> to any particular message, but there is some details about the
> typical BSD implementation that have not yet been discussed.


Mime
View raw message