httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@engelschall.com (Ralf S. Engelschall)
Subject Re: perl is portable
Date Sat, 28 Mar 1998 11:04:52 GMT

In article <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980327190457.18446H-100000@valis.worldgate.com> you wrote:

> I have said it, therefore it is.  Right?

> make isn't, when you want to do anything complex.  .  sh isn't, when you
> want to do anything complex. Once you have perl, it is. Therefore, I will
> use perl for my Apache packages install code.  Sounds like good reasoning? 
> Didn't think so, but I can't think of anything better.

Exactly what I do for my installation stuff: Perl as the
bootstrapping stuff, then the scripts are all in Perl...

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com

Mime
View raw message