httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] HAS_DLFCN -> HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
Date Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:46:18 GMT
rasmus@bellglobal.com wrote:
> 
> 
> > All this revamping seems, IMO, more suited for 2.0 design, rather
> > that 1.3 munging.
> 
> Well, a lot of these issues will disappear with a move to
> automake/autoconf/libtool in 2.0.  The current work is stopgap stuff to
> make up for the fact that Configure sucks.
> 

The issues will disappear with a well thought out [cC]configuration
process... But only if we do it right and exercise some common
sense. Even if we do use autoconf, it doesn't help at all if
we have OS-specific #defines thrown haphazardly around the code.
THAT's what's causing the problems.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message