httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] HAS_DLFCN -> HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
Date Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:14:55 GMT
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> 
> Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > 
> > I personally find it hard to wade through lots of levels of #ifdefism
> > (i.e. http_main.c, conf.h to a lesser extent).  I'd rather see things
> > moved out of conf.h into os.h files.
> 
> Erm, I don't know about os.h - but Jim has already proposed a platform.h
> file (to be built by Configure) that discards all the inappropriate
> #ifdef blocks.  I think a couple of people have +1ed it.  I've been
> musing about it, and I think I'm going to +1 it myself.
> 

Should we even be thinking about this for 1.3 ?

Certainly things will be more carefully layed-out with 2.0...

Someone (Ralf? Rasmus?) mentioned that many people consider our
"beta" releases as other people's "minor" releases... I know I do.
I consider our latest beta as our latest "official, yeah we trust
it enough to run it ourselves" release. As such, we really make
life tough on module makers with all the "little" changes we do
between betas... It seems that stuff that worked transparently
with 1.3bX needs to be changed with 1.3bX+1. Some could say "Hey!
This is beta! Them's the breaks" but that ignores reality.

All this revamping seems, IMO, more suited for 2.0 design, rather
that 1.3 munging.
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message