Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 9993 invoked by uid 6000); 23 Feb 1998 09:05:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 9987 invoked from network); 23 Feb 1998 09:05:09 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 1998 09:05:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 16168 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 1998 09:05:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 01:05:24 -0800 (PST) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: 1.2.6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Not unless we can have NT releases as frequently as we can have unix releases... Dean On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Paul Sutton wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote: > > If you guys don't want to think about 1.2 that is totally fine. > > I probably won't think about anything other than protocol errors after > > 1.2.6. 1.2 is a reference HTTP/1.1 implementation, it is in our interest > > to ensure that it is a faithful implementation. > > Absolutely. We need a clean, stable and tested version of Apache out > there. I think you are doing a great job maintaining the stable 1.2.* > tree. Incidently I wonder if increasing frequency of releases of 1.3 and > creating an apache-users list would help with testing of 1.3? > > //pcs > > >