Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 19085 invoked by uid 6000); 16 Feb 1998 18:04:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 19069 invoked from network); 16 Feb 1998 18:04:31 -0000 Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@198.161.84.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 1998 18:04:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by valis.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA27610 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:04:30 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:04:29 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko To: Apache Developers Subject: Re: InfoWorld article on Apache is up. In-Reply-To: <19980216115502.49987@io.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org AHSP? Hehe. (Apache HTTP Server Project) Apache sports several nice features that make it incredibly attractive. First, Apache is known for its blazing speed on Unix systems, and that same performance carries over nicely to the NT platform. I hate to discourage anyone from gushing over Apache on NT, but that is a lie. The performance does not carry over nicely. Heck, how can you call a server that can't support more than 64 simultaneous connections scalable? Funny how the biggest thing that any review of Apache under Unix whines about is no GUI, but they simply (fairly) mention it in passing! And this is on NT! Perhaps it really is true that NT people are getting sick of pathetic GUIs. On Mon, 16 Feb 1998, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: > I'm surprised I didn't see this already, but the InfoWorld article on > Apache for NT is now up: > > http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayTC.pl?/reviews/980216apache.htm > > Mostly positive, but here are some interesting tidbits: > > "Platforms: Windows NT, Unix, Macintosh, OS/2" > > "Ship Date: Mid-April" > > -- > Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/ > "Everything sucks." - Butthead >