httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <>
Subject Re: HTTP-NG
Date Wed, 11 Feb 1998 03:51:43 GMT
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Ian Kluft wrote:

> > From: Marc Slemko <>
> > On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > Not to mention calling into question the validity of W3C's claim that it
> > > " vendor neutral, working with the global community...". Clearly it
> > > is not.
> > 
> > <ha mode=cynical>
> > All we have to do is join the W3C for $5k/year with a $15k upfront
> > commitment.  Just becase we are too cheap...
> > </ha>
> All you have to do is make new protocol options in Apache and the freeware
> Netscape, and send the URL for the specs to everyone... and W3C becomes
> irrelevant.  It would be to their benefit to work with Apache.

Sure, you _can_ do lots of things.

I don't support going off on our own, and I doubt many people here would
either.  Standards are good.  Vendors trying to force a standard by means
of market share is bad and often doesn't work well.  I fully support
standards.  Right now, that means the W3C.  I understand the desire to
keep the size of groups down.  We face the same problems, only difference
is we don't have a choice of saying these people must spend this much time
on it.

But I have to tell you, that if HTTP-NG gets bogged down defining a new
standard in object mumbo jumbo (not implying it isn't important) then a
whole lot of people, including me, may end up with no choice but to try
to do something that makes my network happy.  HTTP right now doesn't.

View raw message