Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 17720 invoked by uid 6000); 11 Jan 1998 23:23:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 17714 invoked from network); 11 Jan 1998 23:23:35 -0000 Received: from uk1.imdb.com (@192.68.174.59) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 1998 23:23:35 -0000 Received: from robh.imdb.com [194.222.68.23] by uk1.imdb.com with esmtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0xrWhB-000212-00; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 23:21:34 +0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 22:36:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Rob Hartill X-Sender: robh@localhost To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [POLL] experiment with commit-then-review In-Reply-To: <34B8FD52.4481F97@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Rob Hartill wrote: > > > > I'd prefer to see an overall plan... if someone else can put it > > together. > > Personally, I'd rather not have a long discussion and a lot of effort > put into describing the details if there's no certainty we're even > going to try it. That would be a waste, and there have already been > some comments floated that we're too much of a debating society. > I want us to get past the "yeah, let's try it/no, let's not" stage > first, and work out the details later IFF. > > So I guess you're -0, then? I'm +1 on the change. I just hope it's part of wider changes and isn't deemed "enough" to settle things down in the short-term. -- Rob Hartill Internet Movie Database (Ltd) http://www.moviedatabase.com/ .. a site for sore eyes.