Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 22763 invoked by uid 6000); 12 Jan 1998 16:26:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 22757 invoked from network); 12 Jan 1998 16:26:15 -0000 Received: from gate-isdn.ukweb.com (194.152.65.149) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 1998 16:26:15 -0000 Received: from (ecstasy.localnet) [192.168.2.4] by gate-isdn.ukweb.com with smtp (Exim 1.81 #1) id 0xrmiB-000478-00; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 16:27:39 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 16:26:09 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Sutton To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: can anyone explain how to add modules to win32 build? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Marc Slemko wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Do you mean so that they build as part of the ApacheCore build, or do > > you mean more of the existing scheme? > > I'm being sarcastic and saying that having to go through two zillion steps > for each new .dll that I want to generate is a very dumb thing to do > compared to the nice easy Unix way of being able to just cp whatever it is > you have to use and edit the few places that need editing. Yep, you've hit the biggest problem with Windows: you can't automate anything. Well, you can do some things, but there are always things you just cannot automate. Even with nice things like perl. That's the real reason that I wouldn't use an NT server in real live (even more than performance and stability reasons). And I'm sure sooner or later someone has *got* to see through the nice GUI and "cheaper to adminster" arguments to see that administering NT is actually a lot more difficult than Unix. Then again they haven't so far, and IS department just higher more NT gophers to do the donkey work of repetative tasks. Dumb. //pcs