Return-Path: <new-httpd-owner-new-httpd-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 1648 invoked by uid 6000); 10 Jan 1998 03:02:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 1642 invoked from network); 10 Jan 1998 03:02:05 -0000
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91)
  by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 1998 03:02:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 30816 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 1998 03:09:44 -0000
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 19:09:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: sane mail-archive
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980109155333.8064C-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95dg3.980109190920.21012M-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information
 regarding copyright and disclaimer.
Organization: Transmeta Corp.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Not if you use IMAP and a different mailbox format.  Insert caveats here.=
=20

Dean

On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>=20
> > >Anyway, I=B4d say that a 1700k mbox file (and thats just for the last =
9
> > >days) does pretty much choke any reader, too...
> >=20
> > Not pine!  :)  Not eudora either, whose mailbox file format is the same=
 as
> > the Unix format.
>=20
> No, but my mailboxes have forced me to buy another 64 megs of RAM for my
> home box to load 40-100 meg folders into pine.  pine sucks because it
> reads the whole darn thing into memory.
>=20
> Adding memory is cheaper than learning a new mailer though.
>=20
>=20
>=20