Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 3203 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Jan 1998 04:42:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3156 invoked from network); 9 Jan 1998 04:42:56 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.62.130.91) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 1998 04:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11881 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 1998 04:48:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 20:48:19 -0800 (PST) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: somethin amiss on Solaris In-Reply-To: <9801081439.aa01217@paris.ics.uci.edu> Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. Organization: Transmeta Corp. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Does netscape 4 do HTTP/1.1? Can you get a tcpdump with full packets and timeouts of the sessions? And if you can do another truss with the -s or -S or whatever option it is for timestamps that'd be great... Dean On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> Is it fixed by using USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT? 'cause I suspect the > >> pthreads stuff far more than any of the others... it's the major thing > >> that's different between solaris and all other platforms. And it's only > >> used in 2.5 and later, so wouldn't affect Dirk's 2.4. > > > >Yup! That fixed it for me. Roy, how about you? > > Nope, no effect at all. It still hicups and still gets only 9 reqs/sec. > And I did check to be sure it was using fcntl this time. > > Oh cool, I didn't know you could use "truss -f" to trace the entire > process group. Bummer, there doesn't seem to be anything significant > in the truss, except that the problem image seems to get bumped on > the queue. If you are interested, the truss output is at > > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/apache/bum_trace.txt.gz > > Aw crud! It only shows up for Netscape 4.03. There is no hicup > with Netscape 3.01. > > I think I'll give up for the day -- I want to go see "The Postman" > before it disappears. Stupid movie people should know better than > to open a future-fiction movie on Xmas day. > > ....Roy >