Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 13357 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Jan 1998 14:54:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13350 invoked from network); 8 Jan 1998 14:54:16 -0000 Received: from gaia.vr.net (lundberg@205.133.13.5) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 1998 14:54:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (lundberg@localhost) by gaia.vr.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA24950 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 09:54:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 09:54:10 -0500 (EST) From: Gregory A Lundberg To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: voting In-Reply-To: <199801081448.GAA12913@tiber.cisco.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Ian Kluft wrote: > > > Maybe call it the "temporary accelerated development" privilege or something > > > like that. If the idea is adopted, it should probably be codified as an > > > amendment to the voting procedures. > > > > Rome tried this a few thousand years ago. The job title is "Ceasar". It > > worked for a while but eventually led to the downfall of the Republic and > > the rise of the Empire. > > Nice try. But that analogy falls apart so fast that I wonder if you read > the part about responsibilities coming with the privilege? If anyone > (or several people) were to be granted the privilege, the idea as stated > so far would be that it's temporary and they'd still have to report to the > list what they do with the privilege. Hardly sounds like an emperor! > > How about a more serious comment... It was a serious suggestion. That is a serious comment. Why don't you check your history books? Rome had exactly those rules. Their history shows that eventually they will be circumvented. ---- Gregory A Lundberg Senior Partner, VRnet Company 1441 Elmdale Drive email: lundberg@vr.net [205.133.13.8] Kettering, OH 45409-1615 USA voice: +1 (937) 299-7653