Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:44:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Alexei Kosut <akosut@leland.Stanford.EDU>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: The Apache Group's 1st order of business
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980111184451.008b5100@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980111214205.23955A-100000@saga14.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote:

> Alexei Kosut wrote:
> > Another thing to consider, given the recent discussions, might be the
> > following:
> >
> > telnet dev.apache.org
> > cd /export/home/cvs
> > mv apache apache-1.2
> > mv apachen apache-1.3
> > cp -Rp apache-1.3 apache-2.0
> >
> > And then assign the apache-1.3 module to a real release manager so we can
> > finish it up and ship it out, and let people play with apache-2.0 all they
> > want?
> 
> +1.
> 
> Since I presume I'll have to be the one to do this, if there are no
> objections by Tuesday evening I'll do it then.
> 
> Are there changes I need to make to the CVS history or config files to do
> this right?  any s/apachen/apache-1.3/g somewhere?

I don't think so, though you do need to create all the apache-*-cvs
aliases.

And, of course, all those with checked-out copies would need to mess with
the Repository files. And any scripts that work off checked-out copies
(the from-cvs stuff, etc...), I suppose.

But I think CVS itself doesn't care.

-- Alexei Kosut <akosut@stanford.edu> <http://www.stanford.edu/~akosut/>
   Stanford University, Class of 2001 * Apache <http://www.apache.org> *