Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 3181 invoked by uid 6000); 28 Jan 1998 18:13:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 3172 invoked from network); 28 Jan 1998 18:13:39 -0000 Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@198.161.84.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 1998 18:13:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by valis.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA11955 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:13:38 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:13:37 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Need some input for an article... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently writing an article about the Apache 1.3 release for a > german unix mag... > > When writing about performance I was wondering if Dean's 7-25%-patch > will make it into 1.3.0? In other words, when talking about a performance > increase of XX%, what will 'XX' actually be? :) There have been so many changes... and performance changes so much from environment to environment... 10-50% would be fair in some cases. In some it is more. Some less. I'm hoping to get a chance to try it in one environment soon... > > What about the mmap_static module? This won't be in 1.3.0, won't it? Who knows what will happen. Unlikely, but anything is possible. > > > ciao... > -- > Lars Eilebrecht - Don't look back... > sfx@unix-ag.org - the lemmings are gaining on you. > http://www.si.unix-ag.org/~sfx/ >